I will not talk about the well-known facts about one of the most famous conflicts between Romans and Gauls – the Battle of Alesia. However, I’ve always thought that Caesar’s treatement of Vercingetorix in the end wasn’t logical. Here is why:
When Vercingetorix finally decided to surrender and rode alone straight into the Roman ranks, Caesar had two logical options:
1. To kill him right there, or
2. To keep him alive due to some form of respect that he had for him as a warrior.
But Caesar decided to do something quite strange. He kept him alive and humiliated him publicly every year. Then, he had him executed – at the end of the fifth year.
Was Caesar really so sadistic, and was his ego really hurt so much? Did he really need five years to get bored with humiliating his opponent, before doing what he could have done on the very day of the battle? Something was not logical. But most scholars claim that this was the way Caesar demonstrated his might over the savage Gauls until he simply got bored. And that is the end of it.
But Diodorus Sicilus gives us very interesting information on Gaulic customs:
“…for their criminals they keep prisoner for five years, and then impale them in honor of the gods…” Diodorus Sicilus V-32.6.
I believe that thanks to Diodorus we can finally understand Caesar’s logic. By doing what he did he sent a message to the whole of Gaul. The Gaulish warriors were not afraid of losing their lives on a battlefield, but they were terrified of losing their honor.
So the message, in a nutshell, could be the following: “Rome respects your laws, but stand up against the mighty Rome and you will end up imprisoned, dishonored and dead – not as a hero, but as a criminal you are.”
Now, could that be a message worth waiting for, for five years?
“Vercingetorix throws down his arms at the feet of Julius Caesar” by Lionel Royer.